| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Loub
Hero
Joined: 09 Apr 2009
Posts: 132
Location: Searching for a Beluga plush...
|
 Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 7:50 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
| xfenix wrote: |
The only reason you dont have maxed skills is that you effectively waste a ton of skill points on illumination and spiral dance...
|
No...
I was assuming the skill planning of 1.D9 ...or did you thought I was putting points into FF?LoL....
plus...all of my builds are underused...and no thanks...I dont wanna use your imba bugged avoid passive neither your lame playing strategy(only moonstrike , really...)...
and Illumination=Lugaspheres damage
well...if you read the forum you ll actually see that I am using D9 for a LOOOOOONGGGG time...
¬¬ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Koiu Lpoi
Transcendent
Joined: 27 Feb 2008
Posts: 2291
Location: 無駄だ ZA WARUDO
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 8:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Loub wrote: | | I dont wanna use your imba bugged avoid passive |
The description is wrong. The skill is not bugged (afaik). 30 points gives you 15 avoid.
| Quote: | | neither your lame playing strategy(only moonstrike , really...)... |
He's getting spiral dance from the wedding dress... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
xfenix
Prince
Joined: 26 Jul 2008
Posts: 630
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 8:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Loub wrote: | | xfenix wrote: |
The only reason you dont have maxed skills is that you effectively waste a ton of skill points on illumination and spiral dance...
|
No...
I was assuming the skill planning of 1.D9 ...or did you thought I was putting points into FF?LoL....
plus...all of my builds are underused...and no thanks...I dont wanna use your imba bugged avoid passive neither your lame playing strategy(only moonstrike , really...)...
and Illumination=Lugaspheres damage
well...if you read the forum you ll actually see that I am using D9 for a LOOOOOONGGGG time...
¬¬ |
Ofc its for 1D9. Read my post again, I said illumination (where you get a very insignificant amount of damage for the hard points given that you got already like +1k from bane hunter, moonstrike and soft points in illumination /needless to say you rly dont care about elemental damage on melee sorc/) and spiral dance, where is bladestorm now which is the exactly same case - soft points give so much that the hard points have very little effect and are therefore wasted. Its not moonstrike only, its moonstrike + bladestorm from key/scroll/book/heart, as Iv said and spiral dance from astarte.
Last edited by xfenix on Tue Nov 03, 2009 8:24 pm; edited 2 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Deathadvocat
Scout
Joined: 13 Oct 2009
Posts: 18
Location: Germany
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 8:21 pm Post subject: Hammer of the taan judges |
|
|
Has the Hammer of the Taan Judges been edited in 1.d9 RC?
Documentation says total damage + 1.5 per lvl but mine does only 28% at lvl 114. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Oorsombie
Prince
Joined: 29 Jul 2009
Posts: 723
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 8:28 pm Post subject: Re: Hammer of the taan judges |
|
|
| Deathadvocat wrote: | Has the Hammer of the Taan Judges been edited in 1.d9 RC?
Documentation says total damage + 1.5 per lvl but mine does only 28% at lvl 114. |
It was edited in .99, iirc (could be .A9, too).
----
Having to research a build is not difficulty, but time consumption/spare time therapy, if you'd ask me. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Jek
Supreme Being
Joined: 08 Jul 2008
Posts: 1720
Location: the graveyard, luring chickens and killing ravens, looking for the notorious Annihilarious
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 9:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Xypherous wrote: | @ Jek:
Psst. When you're corrected someone about math, you might want to make sure your formula works for boundary cases. |
Left as an exercise. 
| BrotherLaz wrote: | | Howling toad wrote: | | Also, most high-end ubermonsters cannot be defeated "tactically" - you either tank them or die in seconds, they are too fast and too dangerous. |
This is a really cool quote.
'You can't kill the ubers tactically, they're too dangerous'.
It sums up everything that is wrong with D2. |
The necromancer prior to 1.10 begs to differ. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Xypherous
MonAI Master
Joined: 27 Jul 2008
Posts: 1532
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 9:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm of the opinion that exercises for the reader shouldn't involve ones that invalidate your entire numerical argument. 
Here are the actual numbers given correct equations for a sample spread of 25 socketables and no AA% besides charms at the ridiculous measure of 2580 base stats.
Lahs AA% Stones Gain
25 195 0 5031
24 190 1 5076
23 185 2 5115
22 180 3 5148
21 175 4 5175
20 170 5 5196
19 165 6 5211
18 160 7 5220
17 155 8 5223
16 150 9 5220
15 145 10 5211
14 140 11 5196
13 135 12 5175
12 130 13 5148
11 125 14 5115
10 120 15 5076
9 115 16 5031
8 110 17 4980
Even then in this absurd border case, one can see that optimal number of socketables isn't full 'Lahs'.
Here is with base stats:
Lahs AA% Stones Gain
25 195 0 2145
24 190 1 2264
23 185 2 2377
22 180 3 2484
21 175 4 2585
20 170 5 2680
19 165 6 2769
18 160 7 2852
17 155 8 2929
16 150 9 3000
15 145 10 3065
14 140 11 3124
13 135 12 3177
12 130 13 3224
11 125 14 3265
10 120 15 3300
9 115 16 3329
8 110 17 3352
7 105 18 3369
6 100 19 3380
5 95 20 3385
4 90 21 3384
3 85 22 3377
2 80 23 3364
1 75 24 3345 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
sequoia
Warlord
Joined: 06 Aug 2009
Posts: 442
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 10:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It is honestly horrifying hearing some of the suggestions being made.
Laz understands mod-making and balance better than anyone, I really wish he wouldn't have to deal with some ridiculous requests by people who don't have the foresight to see the consequences of some of their ideas. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Quartan
Hero
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Posts: 119
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 10:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
About 100% CurseLengthReduction no longer helping vs. Astrogahs CullingOfTheHerd.
I have seen it reported in this thread already but it seems there was no answer yet - or i just missed it although i believe i read the whole thread.
So i ask again - is that change intentional or an accident/bug ? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Khenra
Hero
Joined: 16 Sep 2009
Posts: 169
Location: Netherlands
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 10:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quartan wrote: | About 100% CurseLengthReduction no longer helping vs. Astrogahs CullingOfTheHerd.
I have seen it reported in this thread already but it seems there was no answer yet - or i just missed it although i believe i read the whole thread.
So i ask again - is that change intentional or an accident/bug ? |
I've had the same happen to me. +1 attention! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
fChat
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
